Search results

Well, yesterday lunchtime I wrote these words and - guess what? - we capitulated as per the script. England took the field in TOTALLY the wrong mindset. When will England learnt hat you can't afford to think negatively when playing the Aussies? The first 12 overs yielded 11 runs and 1 wicket...

I'm still trying to understand the logic of the 'Giles over Panesar' selection. Firstly, Giles stats against the Aussies are poor - before this tour he averaged 16 with the bat and 55 per wicket with the ball. In his first 6 inns against them he amassed 19 runs at an average of 5. Before...

This test is not dead yet. England have already displayed a "safety-first" attitude in their selection, and if they take the field thinking "bat for a draw" they could be in trouble. I believe that if there is a winner it is more likely to be Australia than England, because it is perfectly...

The Aussies must think about Simon Jones and 2005, then look at the cartoon character that is Jimmy Anderson and piss themselves.

I personally think that Giles and Anderson should be dropped for Panesar and Mahmood. Yes, Giles contributed 20-odd with the bat in both innings but his match figures were 1-113. The point is he is a shit bowler WHO DOESN'T TAKE WICKETS. Re. Anderson, 1-195 is also SHIT. Mahmood can do no...