Search results

Did I, or anyone else, say that we can't hear the sound of the RAT?

I know! Ok, I have no idea what sound they'd make. He says he thinks it's engine failure, and gives some reasons. One of the reasons is that the RAT deploys. But he also says there are other things that could cause RAT deployment, so he needed more reasons as evidence that it was engine...

I think you've misread what I posted. I know he posted videos of jets with RATs, and said that he thought that was deployed on the Air India flight. He says he thinks it's double engine failure. But presumably the engines losing power would mean engine failure even if they're still running to...

The one analysing the video in the video

So why didn't the Captain bother to mention it?

I think I can hear both

I don't know any better, but when the captain giving that video gives reasons why he thinks it was engine failure (he can see the RAT, he can hear the RAT, the pilot said he lost thrust, the witness said there was a bang and light flicker), he didn't say 'I couldn't hear the engines'.

:ROFLMAO: Well yeah, you'd hope they know Yes I've seen it. Can you not hear the engines in that?

Does double engine failure not also result in RAT deployment?

One reason you couldn't hear the engines, is because the recording was someone filming another recording, so the audio was terrible.

If it was double engine failure, I'd hope they'd ground all of the same aircrafts, unless they were absolutely sure it couldn't happen to another plane.

If it really was a faulty aircraft that the crew warned about, I would expect air-crash investigators to find out, and that should be the end of Air India. I'm not saying it will be, but it should be.

Air crash investigators, I think I may have found something.

f*** you Greta!

Anyone who saw the fireball from the crash will be shocked that there could be a survivor.

And the survivor says there was a loud bang after take-off.