Search results

Whatever happens in the next 2 games, this will be our season with the fewest number of premier league losses. This is with a team of high potential kids and a few experienced older players,d a manager having his first taste of top flight/English football, and the highest number of days lost to...

Champions of ALL England, I'll have you know.

No, but Parish has form for forcing players to stay, who want away, because the club can't afford to lose them. We don't because we know we can replace practically anyone, thanks to Tony's data. Palace have got by with Freedman's nose for a player, for a good while. But he's gone now.

Including Palace. More likely to sign a new deal with Palace than see clubs trigger the £68m release clause, in my opinion.

I hope you're right, but I just don't see it. I also think he's a bit of a Wilf, and would much rather negotiate a huge deal with Parish, and be a big fish in a tiny, fetid swamp, than a bit player at a big club.

Maybe not, but who needs him?

It's higher than £60m (£68 I think) Possibly someone will come in for him, but who? He's 27, so there won't be any resale value. Most of the clubs with £68m spare, won't see him as the missing piece to their squad. Newcastle, Liverpool, City, United, Arsenal don't need him. He's too old...

This is where Parish is different from Bloom though. Palace won't need to sell any of them. Parish would rather gamble on taking the glory from the football field than building a stable future. It's likely that Guehi will get to leave, but that will be about it, IMO

Yes it is. But ultimately our model relies on finding player that will be world class and having them before they reach their potential. Palace's first 11 is full of players below that level, but playing at their peak. Our model is better in the long term, but diminishes the chance of true...