Search results

You may be correct but in my experience the winners say "good game wannit?" and the loosers say "F@*king Ref"

If there were no VAR most would ignore the errors as "win some, lose some" and "evens itself out over a season". With VAR the wealthier clubs seem to get the benefit more often that not. (Oh Yeah!! IMHO)

I like your idea of vaporisation but think it a bit harsh, I think start with mild electric shocks for first offence. Also have a 10 metre static area around in case players try to harass the robot, not so easy to complain when your hair is frizzed and standing out at all angles. I would however...

I think take the human referee out and have a similar thing to those robotic vacuum cleaners that just roam around the pitch and randomly blows the whistle every time it bumps into something. Better than some of the refs we've had this season :lol:

I think it is an unnecessary level of football bureaucracy. It is inconsistent as at older grounds the camera view is not always accurate (Lewis at Everton, Pervis at Palace) I am told that it gets more right than wrong!! Isn't that the case of most officials throughout the EFL? A PGMOL letter...

Offside was designed to stop goal hanging not to decide if the strikers leg hair was longer than the defenders!! That added to the fact that for some play is allowed to develop while others the flag is raised immediately with no TV scrutiny. Without VAR bad official's decisions seem to even out...