Search results

I'm sure that's the case. In my case, is that it would expand my options considerably. However without the subsidised costs, it simply isn't worthwhile.

The discussion was about your assertion that running a car was a fraction of the cost of public transport. Sure, in your case with subsidised ownership, multiple tenancy, with multiple long distance journeys each month, it's both more convenient and cheaper. but it isn't a "fraction of the...

Thanks for sharing the gymnastics. In summary You pay £1800 to run a car. You pay approximately £200 a year to drive to work. Total = £2000 If you went by public transport it would cost you £960. (assuming 240 working days) So you would need to spend £1040 on public transport journeys a...

Ok I don't understand the appeal, once compared with the cost. I would love to see the mental gymnastics you have to go through in your "fraction of the cost" argument.

Another vote for Car, I've never owned one, never learnt to drive. I don't understand the appeal