He guilty until he can prove otherwise, if he try to prove his innocence beat him, in other words act like the post office did with its sub post masters.
Only just taking an intrest in this, so could someone just dumb it down for me.
1 did all these incidents happen in the same year?
2 the missing money was not missing, hiwever some sub postmasters paid the shortful. Where did this money go.?
3 if that money ended up as profit for the post...