It's an interesting question. As mods our first duty to @Bozza is to protect the site. I might be a bit 'safety first' but we discuss these things together and anything we do can be undone / reversed (though the more a deleted post is quoted, the bigger the job for us and the less likely we are...
Just watched Pitchside. Dunk was on the pitch when the review was being watched by Taylor. It's definitely two separate comments and he knows the second one is out of order. But was probably thinking 'shit, that's another yellow I've just got' rather than worrying about a straight red.
Either...
Yes. Exactly why it's obviously incompetence rather than corruption.
I'm still very much in the 'Dunk's a silly boy and deserved it' camp regarding Saturday, but in terms of what's now given and when and how VAR intervenes, it's a total lottery. Also, every referee who is called to the screen...
Yes, indeed, although this has uncovered a potential issue with warnings since we migrated on to the new board. We're discussing.
Either way a) don't post stuff that you wouldn't be happy defending in a court of law and b) don't crack on when presented with screen shot evidence.
That is all.
What would be unnecessary would be losing the site for everyone due to a libel action. However, you won’t see his libellous post because I deleted it!
I am, however, also a bald prick.
Firstly, check your PMs.
Secondly, of course they’re inconsistent. They are individuals reacting to slightly different incidents covered by laws that are nebulous. It drives us all insane, but it is explicable. However you have NOT proven they are under external influence. If you could I...
I've warned you privately, and now I'm warning you publicly. Post things about officials on here that you can't back up and you'll be banned.
I've absolutely no doubt that PGMOL will check the social media and message boards of the competing clubs. If they take objection to something that...