Search results

Senior Conservative source leaks news!!! We won’t divulge their name - let’s just call them Suella B…. wait that’s too obvious. S. Braverman

I could make a funny here by editing your comment so it just leaves “moronic”, but there’s some very stiff competition.

Exactly. Braverman: "I'll have more to say in due course." I’d really rather you didn’t!!!

Then they needn’t be plowed into it, it would already be in their offshore accounts. I agree with you politically on how shit the government is, I just wish the violent language wasn’t used.

Thankfully - in my view - the electorate will. It would be really interesting actually to have a YouGov poll as of today on the Tory credibility - and on Braverman’s credibility personally. I suspect it would be firmly negative.

Well, no, I don’t want to ignore violent rhetoric whether I agree with the sentiment or not. Violence is never the answer.

I bloody hope not. I genuinely think she would be unelectable regardless.

Well, no. It’s not. It’s his catchphrase which is semi tongue in cheek; “plough them all into a ditch”. He is an awesome poster, who I don’t always see eye to eye with, but we find a common ground. It’s just whenever people fall back into advocating violence, I will always call it out, regardless.

Absolutely! Let’s all advocate murder for people we don’t like. What can possibly go wrong? We’ve been through this before mate. Don’t let your emotions get on top of you - like you said yourself, you’re bigger than that. As for the Tory government, and especially Cruella, they can **** off.

Nope, they wouldn’t leap to defend Hamas. They’d ignore the part they agree with, then only comment on the part they care more about and negate the entire prior paragraph. This is wilfully missing the point and why threads like this end in the Bear Pit, because there is absolutely no nuance to...

Well, the Met are saying a small group of approximately 150 break away protestors did indeed do this, however their impact was significantly downplayed compared to the “football hooligans” who tried to get past the police line to the Cenotaph.

That’s the thing - I am writing my exact thoughts. I don’t pander to anyone with my views, it’s just they are a lot less partisan than most peoples and I am able to think critically regardless of natural prejudice. This is why some struggle to understand my posts - they are balanced.

I’ve experienced first hand what this place is like if you add nuance to an argument that even a small clique generally agree with. It can seem very much like unless you say the exact approved verbiage about a subject, the same four to eight posters immediately disregard and wilfully...

As every other right minded person, I just want protestors to complete their route peacefully. I want the police to be professional and not start any scrapping. I want mourners to be unaffected. And then everyone can home and watch the football.

https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1084274 https://www.warmemorialsonline.org.uk/memorial/134442 https://www.iwm.org.uk/memorials/item/memorial/2022

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_Cenotaph

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/07/police-guard-rochdale-cenotaph-after-graffiti-and-damage-to-wreaths-reported

You’re quite right - “approximately a week ago, give or take”, then.

Are you implying the above article is not true?

Well, this happened in Rochdale less than 48 hours ago: https://news.sky.com/story/amp/rochdale-cenotaph-two-teenagers-charged-with-criminal-damage-for-spraying-free-palestine-on-war-memorial-13004762