Search results

You're conflating two different arguments now. The fact of the matter is the Soton offside was correctly called. You cannot argue this was lucky because it was not inccorrectly called. If we go down this route then I can say all of the goals conceded by Steele were lucky because they were not...

It was clearly and correcty called as offside. Where does the luck come into this? You will have to explain this. I am sure he would like to have clean sheets, to suggest otherwise is silly. That said, I have no idea how much he actually cares about this; it's clearly not his main consideration.

It wasn’t a lucky offside…it was an offside. You’re either offside or you’re not. As for your “original point” yes we did score plenty more than the opposition but Steele’s footwork plays a part in this; he literally has assists to his name. RDZ’s keep-possession-and-entice-the-opposition game...

His is quite a remarkable story. Well done.