Search results

Semantics imo, but consider your view respected

It’s established terminology. I doubt many people take it in the context of football (like a tribal thing , as in ‘I support Brighton , I don’t support Palace’). I presume most rational people recognise horrendous have been committed across the board, sadly.

I’m still trying to get my round the idea that you think highlighting doubts over HOW children were murdered is a great point. Whatever next. And it’s not a case of taking sides. You’ve jumped to your own conclusions there. Also I’m curious as to why you’ve put inverted commas round support...

1) there were reports of people in London actively celebrating the developments at the weekend 2) you’re taking the view that the nature of the massacre can be neatly separated from the plight of the those in gaza . That’s your opinion . I would say the support from some quarters of the world...

Of course. It’s still possible to hold the view I put in my original post though. [and I had already considered your valid point before posting it).

Thanks for educating me on this. Changed to ‘murdering children’. apologies to any members of Hamas for not getting the latest on how they murdered children.

Yes, fair enough . I had already changed my wording

Israel/Gaza has been a complicated / horrific mess for a long time. One thing is clear though. Anyone who doesn’t condemn the recent massacre, holds the view that, under certain circumstances, murdering children is justified.