Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. M

    [Albion] Van Hecke or Webster?

    Well no. And I know you're by no means the only one making this point. It's become a trope on NSC. What's happened with Webster this season: -- played broadly well in pre-season, although his passing radar was off -- Luton, wasn't really stretched, passing not great -- Wolves, one or two stray...
  2. M

    [Albion] Van Hecke or Webster?

    We can't judge a player on one performance, but my thoughts on Igor were: -- his passing wasn't up to much, too slow in releasing the ball and about half of many passes to JPvH were behind him -- in contrast to you, I think he has impressive pace once he's got going, it's the getting going bit...
  3. M

    [Albion] Van Hecke or Webster?

    Isak wasn't lacklustre. We outplayed Newcastle today. They were still dangerous and most of that was to do with Isak. Yet JPvH still managed to shut him down a few times when in extremely dangerous positions.
  4. M

    [Albion] Van Hecke or Webster?

    I'm a big Webster fan, but he deserved to be dropped. His biggest current problem for me is that his passing isn't up to it in a RDZ system. He's giving the ball away 3 or 4x a game at the moment. JPvH had a storming game. No idea what @AlbionBro is on about.
  5. M

    [Albion] Van Hecke or Webster?

    Lacklustre attack with Isak playing. Righto.
  6. M

    [Albion] Van Hecke or Webster?

    You're so badly wrong on too much. RDZ has an opinion and, when he's fit, he picks Webster. He's also happy to play JPvH.

Top
Link Here