Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. G

    [Cricket] England v Australia, Only Test, Trent Bridge

    But that's even worse; it suggests that people are selecting regardless of the actual performance. Although, I suspect that you're right and other nations would do the same, India certainly would
  2. G

    [Cricket] England v Australia, Only Test, Trent Bridge

    The BBC poll was an excellent example of English exceptionalism. In 19 times out of 20, the winning team will produce the player of the match (unless there's an exceptional performer in the losing team and none in the winners). So, Gardner produces the second best bowling performance in women's...
  3. G

    [Cricket] England v Australia, Only Test, Trent Bridge

    Ecclestone is so much better than the other bowlers that it's rather embarrassing. We're certainly missing Katherine SB, the seamers are far too erratic
  4. G

    [Cricket] England v Australia, Only Test, Trent Bridge

    It is a different size but she has played men's cricket, so it wouldn't be strange to her
  5. G

    [Cricket] England v Australia, Only Test, Trent Bridge

    If Moeen's not up for bowling (and Jacks isn't really a frontline test bowler), England could be really radical and call up Ecclestone. I swear she bowled most testing deliveries in that last session than Moeen bowled all match. It won't happen, of course, but I reckon that she'd be a very...
  6. G

    [Cricket] England v Australia, Only Test, Trent Bridge

    Sophie Ecclestone bowled superbly and really unlucky not to get more wickets, she's a class act. Bit too much buffet bowling from the others

Top
Link Here