Search results

....based on? I can't understand how the debate could morph into that if you just said 'I don't agree with GL but I defend his right to say what he said'.......

I just dipped into this thread again, so apologies if you have already explained..... but if you are agreeing with the majority that freedom of speech needs to be preserved (regardless of your support for the sentiments expressed), then surely that is all that is being debated! No need to say more!

.. fair response. Even the tory cabal can say what they like and try to shut down free speech.... as long as we stop them actually doing it in the name of free speech!

Some I am sure do.... but I speculate (and it is speculation) that most don't. Maybe they can cater for both by offering both alternatives?

why not just watch without sound and make a cup of tea or something during analysis?

Do you think there will be 'fury' from the NSC tory extremists who claimed there was no such apology?

This expresses the situation better than I could.....

and..... Mark Dollman 54 minutes ago The Tories made the most out of being offended, and the BBC had to be seen to be doing something about it, but probably didn't expect the backlash. One postive is that it's highlighted the Richard Sharp situation again.

BBC apology to Gary Lineker? Apparently so... and quite right too.

Maybe this might explain it all to the hard of understanding....