Facebook
Twitter
Contact us
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Sky Sports Latest
The Daily Seagull
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Latest activity
The Daily Seagull
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Register
Log in
Home
Search
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Search results
[Politics]
HMRC. FIT FOR PURPOSE?
I'd be interested to know the rate it makes sense at.
keaton
Post #46
Mar 10, 2023
Forum:
The Big Board
[Politics]
HMRC. FIT FOR PURPOSE?
But that's it what number isn't going to lead to massive shortfall that won't also mean part-time or low income workers would be better off unemployed. And I'm no way convinced only taxing higher earners 20-30% will mean they stop trying to avoid it
keaton
Post #29
Mar 9, 2023
Forum:
The Big Board
[Politics]
HMRC. FIT FOR PURPOSE?
Wouldn't that lead to hugely less tax being received?
keaton
Post #23
Mar 9, 2023
Forum:
The Big Board
Home
Search
Top