Search results

But this is a momentary glance. It doesn't detract at all from the moment of joy (there might be certain goals where you delay the celebration for half a second, but no more than that) Remember also that pre VAR there was much less chance that the goal would be disallowed, so for an example if...

Even if it costs us a league place it will still be a lot of money. I wouldn't be against us suing.

Well ok., but imagine that Undav hadn't been there. There's still an incorrect decision made here. You're suggestion wouldn't improve anything,. but lead to a lot more breaks in play

VAR an utter abomination. It's been the worst development in the history of football and should be removed immediately until they can find tech which works and people skilled enough to use it. Disallowing goals like that when miles onside, disallowing goals like MacAllister v Leicester. Total...

My guess is that is angle VAR used to disallow the goal. The justification is likely to be because they didn't have full view of the defender behind, (the one playing Estupinan on) they used the the one in front. Terrible decision

Are there any other angles? That is obviously onside from that view