Search results

maybe, the names cited dont usually run off to government asking for regulation, they usually try to avoid it. on second look it may be they want to hobble a competitor who has run away from the pack, though they could just pick up the phone and ask OpenAI to stop. Microsoft just invested...

publicity stunt: the people signing are those in control of the business and engineering teams creating the AI system. they can just stop development.

its not really AI in the literal hard AI sense. its a form of AI, machine learning, that take on thousands of samples, learns and reproduces something very close to appearing like human output. its not really that novel, tech reached a point where there is enough compute power to respond in...

it's a pattern that emerged in development. there's always been a bit of copy+paste since the web. difference is in that editting, making the example fit the actual scenario and then understanding it to debug or amend. we have started to see developers that dont seem to know how to do that...

Write an angry letter to CEO at Brighton & Hove Albion about the club's failure to replace striker Jesus Dear [CEO of Brighton & Hove Albion], I am writing to express my extreme disappointment and frustration with the club's failure to replace striker Jesus. As a devoted fan of Brighton & Hove...

there's been some similar tools generating "AI art". they can produce thousands of outputs in minutes, that would take an artist hours, even days, for each piece. but they dont curate, cant see or fix anomolies and weird outputs (for some reason hands are impossible to generate). its usful to...

it is very clever. what it does well, it does very fast and gives people the impression of some intelligence. there's a lot of processing under the hood though. what is doesn't do is comprehension, its rather formulaic in response (though this might be deliberate!), and something it cant do...