Search results

I think the UK could be convinced about the advantages of paying a much higher ring-fenced tax two ways 1) You do not have to sell the family jewels/house to fund care homes 2) Dentistry. Walk around Berlin and you will see a dentist every couple of blocks or so. There are obviously many...

It’s shocking how someone with zero experience and knowledge of healthcare gets to be the health minister. Compare this to Germany. https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/ministry/leadership/minister-of-health.html

To answer your question health professionals.

I trust you were nice and slim when you had your lobotomy?

This is my initial thinking as well. Why make health care so complicated. All you need is GPs, A&E and and emergency number and a non-emergency number as the first line of defense. Anyone ends up in the wrong place they’re triaged to the right place. How difficult is this?

Edit. Can’t be arsed.

The judiciary is apolitical. MHRA is. This is two without even thinking….must be more.

Health care in Germany is a ring-fenced fixed percentage of your income i.e. it’s means tested. Further, for higher earners there’s a point where it’s cheaper to opt out and get private insurance….if you so choose. I would support this in the U.K.

Quite possibly a stupid question, but doesn’t the triage at A&E deal with people who don’t need A&E?

This. The more cost effective approach is to be checked regularly. I get vouchers every year over here to be checked for numerous things.

How do you judge quality of life? There’s people I know who lead dull lives…..not sure I want them exterminated though.

There are numerous solutions. A number of countries have health care services preferable to the NHS. Just copy what they do. But, it will cost you.

Treat everyone on medical need and without prejudice.

There’s been a lot of coverage of the collapse of the NHS in the German press. On comment common to a number of articles it’s far too centralized and therefore unwieldy. Funding is obvs another.