Search results

It's like talking to a very dull brick wall. Potter was very good at Brighton. In the context that existed whilst he was here, he was fantastic. He had flaws that are now clear to see and got a lot of slack from the media with blame often thrown onto the players instead. BUT, that doesn't mean...

As I said in another post, if you excuse the Leicester game as an anomalous extraordinary result, Potter's goals per game ratio was only 0.1 goals per game better off than the previous season. We weren't scoring more goals in reality this season under Potter - we had got 4 wins (United, West...

We didn't score at home against suicidal Norwich last season. Yes our xG was higher than our output but over a three season size it is completely reductive and incorrect to blame it on lack of quality, individual errors and bad luck. We controlled a lot of the games we played, we created lots of...

What on earth are you talking about? In our three seasons under Potter we scored 39 goals, 40 goals and 42 goals. That's 1.06 per game and a consistent record across three seasons, including last season with basically the current squad. This season, we scored 11 in 6 under Potter (including...

Very difficult for the club to offer long term assurances but the word coming out of the club after the fact was that there would have been places found for them during the transition at the very least and then up to the new manager. The club like to cultivate and keep staff members connected to...

I guess this is the thing. It was shaping up after a promising but often frustrating progression (lots of long runs of poor form especially at home) but he jumped ship before delivering on it. The whole point of progression is that you take the good and the bad with the understanding that the...