Search results

Kaysing was a technical author. It's a skilled job but wouldn’t give Kaysing the insight or knowledge to ascertain failure in rocket or lunar module/lander design. He had a degree in English and wrote documents so that equipment could operated. This encompasses user guides and maintenance...

More than likely. His wiki page state his degree was in English and that he was a technical writer and so not an engineer. To be on the space programme as an engineer you would need an engineering degree. I would argue that his technical knowledge would not have been sufficient to question the...

As I posted earlier he had what looks suspiciously like a mental breakdown and then basically went on walkabout for a year, on his return he started spouting his theories … made himself rich though.

Sorry but the analogy doesn’t work. NASA would have had to have designed and built the various bits of kit, trained astronaughts, mission controllers etc, flown to the moon and then simply not bothered. This is the minimum because we know that the Russians followed the flight of Apollo 11 and...

Anyone and everyone involved in aviation and rocket research was involved in the moon landings beginning with the sound barrier and Gemini project. it’s in the 10’s of 1000’s not in 100’s. The supply chain just for the rocket is enormous even without taking into account the R&D effort. You are...

Clearly someone that hasn’t carried out an academic research piece, in fact a very purile statement on your part. The fact that you can actually post that using the technology at your disposal is down to peer reviewed work. FWIW, the history of semiconductor design and manufacture is IMHO...

That last bit doesn’t actually make sense.

by ‘highly biased’ you actually mean ’factual and peer reviewed’. They are questionable because they don’t align with your narrative and are in all likelihood from accepted sources. if you want to do this properly can I suggest you perform a literature review on the moon landings, or lack of...

Manipulating minds is very much what those that propose conspiracies have a habit of doing ….

Kaysing a man who if descriptions are anything to go by had a nervous breakdown and went on walkabout, not exactly what I would call reliable. Gustav Le Bon last work was in 1931. The field has come on from his work so would suggest reading someone a bit more up to date, don’t throw it out but...

the difference between mainstreamers and conspiracy theorists is that we ( mainstreamers) ask questions and then read up to find answers rather than just ask weird questions and then refer to unverified and very questionable sources, or just asks the question and leaving at that.

Having read a great deal about the US and Russian space programmes, from the race to break the sound barrier upto the end of the Apollo missions, it is very, very ,very unlikely that they were faked. The accounts, of which there are many, explain in detail in how it was achieved but also details...