Search results

Wouldnt take that cameo as any sort of sample for future performances. Debut in a big match with 10 mins to go, of course he's going to put lots of effort in.

Realistically we're fine without even bringing in a replacement as we already have Mitoma, March, MacAllister, Gross, Lallana, Sarmiento, Enciso, Ferguson, Welbeck, and Buononotte in the attacking areas. And we have Adingra to come in next season. All with an extra £27m in the bank, and we dont...

Bloom was only going to sell if his valuation was met, and we're told there were multiple teams interested. There is no way Bloom would have done the deal now if the add ons were unachievable. It'll be something simple like the extra £6m once he's played 20 games, just so Arsenal can put that...

Out of favour here, will not sign a new contract, has publicly stated he wants to leave, and is 29 this year… I’d say £27m is very good given the circumstances.

£27m, I think that’s decent business for us.

£27m including the add ons

This is the point where Tony takes Arsenals bid into consideration and waits for a higher bidder, 10 days of transfer window to go.

If we’re getting £25m-30m for a player who we’re not desperate to replace and doesn’t wanna be here then win win.

If someone offers what Tony believes is his value then we should take the offer. I'd love him to stay and help us achieve another great season, but the reality is that for whatever reason he's currently unhappy and unmotivated. That feeling may linger through the season until we then sell him...

Is he back in the country?

Do we know if Leo is back in training this week? Or at least back in the country?

£12m is a joke offer from Spurs, and should tell Leo all he needs to know, in that he’d be a bench player

You could be right. As the transfer window moves on and potentially there arent many serious bidders he might have a rethink and realise what a good thing he's throwing away. Its all so easily fixed. But I fear more likely is his agent continues to feed the issue.

If the thing that “humiliated” Leo was RDZ calling him out in a team meeting for not working hard enough, which seems to have been hinted, then he will not survive at a top club. That sort of thing happens at every club. You only have to watch those All or Nothing docs to see it. So for Leo to...

It’s such a shame isn’t. If he’d let Bloom/Barber/RDZ know that he 100% wasn’t going to sign a new contract then the latest he would have had to wait for a move is the summer as it would have been our last chance to cash in. No need for any of this.

As others have said, unfortunately now we're a club that hovers around the upper mid table zone the occasions on which the top clubs try to take our players & turn their heads will increase. Or occasionally players will be tempted to think they're ready to step up to the next level and try to...

Its such a poorly written statement in terms of what they're trying to achieve.

This statement changes nothing to what we thought... the player has been stroppy, RDZ has rightfully isolated him, but now the player is trying to justify his stroppyness. Its all the game of trying to engineer a move as the next step is we have to sell him.

Its a bizarre statement isnt it. You can tell the intention is to paint Leo as the innocent figure and give their side of the story, but at the same time it details his bad behaviour.

If you're in an argument with someone and then describe it to others as being over a trivial matter it doesnt exactly show that you were the innocent party. If you truly felt you were innocent and the victim within the argument you would more likely detail why you felt wronged. Just paints Leo...