Anyone can play 007 though, it's just a number.
James Bond however is a long established character.
Whether people would pay to go see a female 007 who knows. Make it and let the box office decide.
My arguments are solid as.
As opposed to the simple types who can't offer anything that resembles a valid reasoning for changing established characters from how they were created.
Not an issue?
You have no idea what you're talking about. :lolol: Like none.
It's been a big thing for a while now to call out whitewashing a character.
In 2017 when Scarlett Johansson played a character in Ghost in The Shell there was a huge amount of noise made about that casting.
Not...
Have to agree.
The longer they draw these franchises out for nothing more than money the worse they get and move away from what made the originals classics.
Wrong. Just because its fiction doesn't mean it doesn't have its own established characters, worlds and customs within it.
Just because Star Trek is fiction doesn't mean you can go and make Dr Spock a Klingon who thinks rashly. That's just screwing with an established character because the...
Because there's 50 years of him being a White Scotsman as part of his backstory. Pretty obvious really.
Why exactly would you change the canon of the character named James Bond however?
There's literally no reason too. Makes zero sense as part of his history.
The fact you're asking why would...