You misunderstood my post.
A guilty verdict and zero punishment would, in my opinion, have been a better result.
The precedent, as I said to another legal expert on here, would be that other people could tear down other statues and use this case as justification.
Are you a politician?
You seem to selectively pick up parts of the comment to argue.
I am 100% sure you are correct about jury trials.
Do you not think other people may act in a similar manner and expect a similar acquittal ?
Were the Brighton fans charged?
As previously stated I can agree with the sentiment but not the action.
(As I did with the goalposts. The club was skint so that really helped them)
You talk about facts but these defendants went prepared to do damage and did so. This verdict could easily set...