Search results

As much as England have been absolutely shit, how many chances do India expect to be allowed pass up and still win?

Nothing will come close to that. England declared at 591-6 or something (Collingwood 200, Piterson 150 or something) and managed to lose the game. It was pathetic.

I was being facetious, I'll admit. But really, there HAS to be a place for the limited over stuff - it's what pays the bills. The problem is indeed the way the whole game is set up - there appears to be no coherent strategy that accommodates both the long form and limited over stuff. To be...

They should certainly make changes to the 4 day format - I'd suggest fewer games separate by an extra "backup" day - but T20 and The Hundred are the formats that pay the bills. Regardless, I just don't believe Sibley is the best we can do.

So Sibley is shit because you don't like The Hundred? Er, righto. :rolleyes:

Often said, but can you honestly say with certainty that we can't do better than Sibley? He is the worst England opener I can remember. Absolute :shit:

Wrong batflid. No, wait. :facepalm:

This is all on the captain I'm afraid. Strange choice of attack with some crappy defensive field positions after those first two wickets. Annoying.

Sibley won't, he'll be back in the hutch after about 5 balls.

27/2 Scores level. Well well well...

Sibley is absolutely crap but I don't know enough about the county scene to suggest an alternative.

20 minutes later and neither of these two walking wickets are out. It must be raining.