Search results

See that bit I've bolded? That. Onside or offside is factual. You are either ahead of the "last man" when the ball is played or not. It isn't a matter of opinion, it is an objective truth. Our ability to accurately measure offside with the current VAR technology is where the problem lies...

That's because onside or offside is a factual decision and the authorities believe the technology is accurate and reliable enough to know down to such tiny margins (I know us fans don't agree but that is a different argument). When it comes to whether a challenge is a foul, it is defined as...

I have no idea why you've responded to my post with that. I wasn't defending the ref or VAR. But I'll answer your questions: I don't believe it is ok to wrestle Dan Burn to the ground. For me, the wolves defender was making no attempt to play the ball and was active engaged with trying to...

I disagree that he was fouled (and thinking you're fouled does not justify you reacting - in the eyes of the laws of the game anyway; players frequently get booked/sent off for reacting). But even if he was fouled, the red card Dunk got was for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. The...

It's a weak argument that it was like Dunk's - Maupay didn't have possession of the ball, or likely to get it, it was further out, there was a second defender covering, and it was more Maupay running into the well placed defender rather than the defender grabbing the shirt and pulling him back...

I think there was one in particular in injury time where the wolves player blocked him off and the ref gave wolves the free kick.