Search results

Where income is low, and there is a health or work need for a second car in a household, I’d agree. Further decreasing the disposable income of those with least to start with (when you’re trying to kickstart an economy) seems counterproductive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No, I’m not. I’m glad you’re so far removed from such a situation that you find it inconceivable, nonetheless not everybody’s so fortunate. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But your underlying assumption is that it’s an extra £2 per week that this imaginary couple can afford without impact. I’m sure the £2 a week might be found out of the food budget, it might be the pet insurance that goes, or a dental plan they’ve not needed recently. I’m not arguing that if...

What an assumption. Couples can easily have two different jobs, in two different places, neither easily reachable via public transport. If your assumption is that everyone in a two income household is thriving and has plenty disposable income, let me assure you it’s an incorrect assumption...