Search results

Piss off :lol:

I agree, he’s cost a lot coin but the stability would surely be worth it.

Understood, I just have a deep seated loathing of that particular phrase.

No worries, I appreciate it’s pretty frantic on here tonight!

I actually think we’re a good striker away from being a comfortable team, but until we find that elusive scorer any other deficiencies will be magnified.

Why do they have to be labelled in the first place? It’s not a crime to have a different opinion.

I’ve explained my post but don’t let that get in the way of this rather romantic Dutch Rudder going on here.

That was definitely poor from Ben, also poor from Dunk, but zonal marking has got us into trouble other numerous times this season, like leaving Maupay on Maguire against United, Veltman on Vestergaard and March on Mina (I think?) . It’s easy to predict for the opposition and they can line...

I clearly misunderstood, I thought when you said “ people with a brain back Potter” was suggesting that if you doubt Potter you don’t have a brain? Again, apologies that I misunderstood what you were inferring.

Several times we’ve lost the lead and it’s usually due to set pieces, that’s down to the manager’s system. Your opening gambit where you stated the other poster didn’t understand PL football seemed a bit self assured to me, apologies if I misunderstood the meaning behind it.

Ah, so people that have a different opinion are brainless, good to know.

I forgot all about his anti Ryan stance. One rule for one eh.

In my humble and ever unwelcome opinion it was full of inaccuracies but I couldn’t really be troubled with pointing them out. An example is where he blames the defenders for our shortcomings, they conceded 2 goals against West Brom, Burnley, Sheff Utd and Fulham and we didn’t win a single...

I don’t really care tbh, but clearly some people use it as a way to gauge the NSC mood. A lot of people vote in it too so that surely says something.

It’s a defence mechanism, so if it all goes to shit we can be reassured it was an accepted part of the plan.

I’m getting that impression. Think I might go and Google the definition of narcissism.

There you go, you don’t like it therefore it’s moronic. Kind of highlights my point. I do agree that the tool who wanted us to lose so he could give Potter abuse was well out of line.

A classic ‘you’re wrong and I’m right post’.

Go back and check all of your posts from today or directly after every match, you’ve labelled the Potter In-Out Poll as pathetic because you don’t like it, you are outraged at multiple people in the match day thread as they had the cheek to say we defended badly etc.

I think there’s a lot ‘lumping together’ going on here, anyone who disagrees or has a different viewpoint immediately gets branded with the outspoken fools who say sensationalist things just for the sake of it, it’s like a kind of censorship or something. Not saying it’s intentional, but as...