Search results

My issue is that he didn't overrule him per se, but refereed the decision from scratch without consideration of the original refs decision. It was incredibly marginal but the VAR ref decided he had to rule one way of the other, and came down on the side of penalty. What VAR should do is say 'its...

Strange? Not really. The premier league refs are the best in the country. I would have hated being on the opposite side of either of the villa and Liverpool penalty decisions, but the letter of the law was applied. Same here. I can see why he decided the foul did continue into the box - just -...

I have to say its a penalty. A premier league ref looked at it for ages and concluded it was a penalty. He knows the laws of the game far better than me. So penalty. For me its more about VAR enabling a re refereeing of the game from the TV box, its not what VAR is supposed to be about.