Search results

No, no you don't. But you will never enter a debate on anything meaningful, because you know I'm way way smarter than you. (And before you get carried away, it is the very definition of damning with faint praise :facepalm:). I'm off to watch some football, but I'm sure the next time I'm on...

I wouldn't worry too much, from what I've seen, he does seem to be quite gentle with genuine idiots :thumbsup: Ooops I think I've overdosed

Twisting your words ? I QUOTED you :lolol: And with that I have reached my idiocy quota for the day :bigwave:

WTF are you wittering on about now :shrug: I'm simply pointing out the complete and utter gross stupidity of this post you made. where you claimed that the Government didn't want to be forced to maintain food standards, so that they could then prove how honourable and honest they were by...

Happy now ? Exactly the same point stands :shrug: It's almost like pastafarian has a daytime account :lolol:

Straight to the crux again :lolol:

So, remove the law, so they prove that they are doing it because they are principled and honest. And they say satire is dead :facepalm: That is a sterling bid for favourite satirist on NSC :lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol:

Someone keeps on dragging this back to Brexit, but since you insist :facepalm: So live exports are going to be reviewed after Brexit. The same as when you wrote are all being reviewed after Brexit. Well, as your Brexit supporting friends take great delight in pointing out, Brexit happened...

I thought this thread was about Food standards and Animal welfare, something that I know from your previous posts, you have very strong views on. I would have thought you may want the opportunity to share them again, while it's being discussed ???

You're absolutely right, nothing has changed yet. Makes you wonder why they would go through all the hassle and negative publicity of this doesn't it ???