Don't think I made myself clear. Of course Sky/BT want to show the big games. But the clubs will want them to be the ones that are PPV if that would bring in more money for them. I have no idea how much the Manchester derby would bring in PPV but it would likely be more than the money the clubs...
Yep - think that is the bit people are overlooking. If it carried on like this then clubs would be out of pocket - I think the extra games were to keep Sky/BT sweet for the money they think they lost last season. It would need Sky/BT to stump up more money for the clubs to show all of the games...
Be interesting to see how this affects the games being picked. Given that Liverpool/City/United are on Sky/BT so much, they will have very few chances to use their PPV which would likely be a pretty penny. All depends if the extra money per game over the top of the minimum offsets the income...
Not sure of your logic there. How would cancelling Sky help as you then couldn't legally watch the games they show? Only non televised games are PPV. You will get the same value, however you quantify that, from your Sky subscription. The only difference is that games you would normally or and...