Search results

Thought he was poor, but agree Welbeck decision was spot on.

Definitely encroachment. Hooper gave that signal as he booked him.

The NFL is the best example. I like the idea of the coaches being allowed to challenge once per half. As per my other post, the whole allocation of referees requires a lot more transparency, and that’s a starting point. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Thanks Stato. The Caldy one was a shocker, never mind leading Cavanagh vs Man Utd and yesterday’s inept display. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Can’t recall precisely Icy Gull may remember, but he gave a penalty when Fletcher hand balled outside the area. Think he said the arm was Elphicks but even that was questionable. Cue inevitable Poyet outburst. Then there was the great tackle by Calderon at The Amex again vs Bournemouth, that...

Poyet’s criticism when he gave a penalty at Withdean? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Agreed. We could have started it Friday. It’s not about performances, it’s about neutrality, which apparently since League 1, when managing our games Hooper seems incapable of IMO. It simply cannot be a one-off in his case. Even the Complete and Utter Schyster has had some good games for us...

We all knew what he was going to be like - poor What I don’t understand is the whole allocation process, I mean involvement in our games three times in seven days, despite controversial input in the first? Can the club not appeal? Is there any transparency as to how it works. Sent from my...