Search results

Nope. That’s a deliberate misrepresentation, as you know. This is all about acting like a leader of a cult and making every discussion possible about the manager. I have no interest in getting involved in your Potter in/Potter out discussion. If you can’t see the difference between campaigning...

I don’t dislike you Vagabond. I don’t know you. I’m sure you are a very pleasant chap in real life. I have simply become irritated by your one trick pony approach to many threads I open. When you started doing it on match day threads I became particularly irritated as real match days are gone...

:). Not you mate ! I’ve always enjoyed your contributions. I’m going to have to look up ‘enterage’ now to understand the insult I just used

Nothing in what I have said suggests anything of the sort. I have enjoyed the football since Potter was appointed. I had a few weeks of wavering pre Christmas when the tempo reduced significantly and I couldn’t see anything being done about it. Before that and since I have been loving it. I have...

Or they just had a different opinion. It’s also worth pointing out that expressing doubts about GP doesn’t imply a wish for the return of CH. It’s this type of binary thinking that is turning support for BHA into some sort of celebrity game show. Potter in/Potter out. I couldn’t care less about...

Nothing will help me understand this thread a bit better :) However, I do understand the reason it was bounced.

A handful of big mouth pundits thought the sacking of CH was wrong. Hardly ‘the football world’ is it. This thread could have been started by the Mail or the Sun. It’s typical of the OTT cheerleading relentlessly pushed out by vagabond. The football world doesn’t owe us anything. It doesn’t even...

Er, no. I didn’t report him. Leave me out of your conspiracy theories

I don’t care what you think. I do wonder why you are bumping old threads of your own and why you are so needy

Oh great, Vagabond is in vengeance mode again Own up, who showed him the search function?

My apologies. I thought I remembered an exchange between Noo BHA and yourself that said you did. My mistake.

What perplexes me is JRG’s claim that he knows CH. Despite this, JRG seems to be single handedly damaging Chris’ legacy with his obsessional, one eyed, repetitive posting. Either Chris is aware, in which case he goes down in my estimation or he is unaware and JRG needs to take a look at himself...

How about a new sub forum for manager fanboys ? We could call it The Pit of Sycophancy or The Stalkers Lair.

Presumably the list of people up against a wall and facing a firing squad when the revolution arrives. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

Thank goodness for that.

Fair enough. Your analogy, your rules :smile: Your last sentence is irrefutable !

I think we all know that ‘teams like Brighton’ is not John Barnes’ only agenda here. As someone else pointed out, he has never waded in to support the unfair sacking of Big Sam. A few high profile campaigners threw racism accusations at the club when Hughton was sacked and subsequently were...

The ignorance of someone making a remark along the lines of ‘races like Africans’ is matched by the ignorance of John Barnes with his clubs like Brighton agenda. He seems to believe in a natural order in football which is at odds with his other views. Seems like a perfectly reasonable analogy to me.

Read the whole post. Try not to politically point score.

Good summary. We are long-standing STH. We spend a lot of money supporting the club. This season we have enjoyed watching football at the AMEX whereas last season we did not. To me that is the only statistic that matters. Not sure why John Barnes or random away fans think it is anything to do...