Search results

He never misses an opportunity to tell us, yet again, how he was, allegedly, at death’s door.

Another one to add to the pant shitting list :lolol:

A worthy entry to the Pant Shitter list! What utter drivel. I particularly like the “estimated to be large enough for 70 homes, that could sell for up to 10 million” Think big! Maybe we should all have a rethink about our situations: Herr Tubthumper’s modest abode could be demolished, and...

You can be arsed to spend the best part of Saturday replying to posts. But can’t when asked to qualify something. I think we all know how to interpret this admission.

A couple of PMQs and Titanic and Mouldy Boots are all ready shitting themselves :lolol:

I’ve been called a condescending prick and a champagne socialist today. Maybe Beach Seagull can call me a hypocrite as well? Then I can call it a days

I think it’s quite good for a Friday afternoon.

Losing the argument so resort to name calling. That’s my observation.

You’ve observed he’s asking questions in PMQ; good work Sherlock. What else have you observed today? That this morning followed night?

Blame Starmer. Excellent. :thumbsup:

As I said, it’s not Prime Ministers Answers.....it’s Prime Ministers Questions.

Do you really think Cummings would allow this “pooling of resources”? He wont even let a bunch of academics on the SAGE committee have some peace and quiet to think and discuss their science...he’s hardly going to let a political and intellectual might and challenger in.

The clue is in the name....Prime Ministers Questions. If you want to change it to Prime Ministers Questions and help with the Answers that’s fine...but it’s a slightly different discussion.

The whole point and purpose of “the opposition” and PMQs is to hold the government to account for its actions. Both are purposefully there and both are tools of a functioning and democratic parliament. Starmer doesn’t have to provide solutions....that’s up to Boris...after all he’s the PM.