Search results

Well Is it PotG? certainly knew about it over a week ago, because when I started this thread about it, he posted on it, tried his normal whataboutery, got pulled back to the subject of the thread and then went on to make a complete and utter fool of himself...

Taking whataboutism to a whole new level, congratulations :lolol:

No, I corrected him and, a few hours later he agreed he was wrong. But I know you struggle with simple facts :lolol: And to be fair, I can see why, relatively speaking, you would think that :thumbsup:

46.45 It seems to be a daily occurrence now on the briefings, that Civil Servants point out that no matter how many test targets you set and how many you 'do' (or send out!), it's pointless if you can't get accurate results back in a timely manner :facepalm: How many hints do these useless...

No, no they're not, and they don't. Civil servants are not, and have never been 'in government'. Government is made up of democratically elected politicians. Beyond that, I really have no idea what you are on about, and I'm afraid, it's fairly obvious you don't either :shrug:

It's been happening for some time. I had an interesting chat with a mate this afternoon. Those Civil Servants behind the lecterns have three choices, resign and contradict the government, contradict the government and get sacked or try to be really, really subtle. (To be fair, she wan't that...

The Civil Service aren't allowed to contradict the Government in press briefings and, therefor, it has to be far more subtle. You have to look for what they don't say or don't confirm. Look at yesterday's briefing, particularly in the areas highlighted and you will start to see what is happening...

That is interesting, because it's the first set of figures I have seen where the prime intention is (as far as possible) to compare statistics by only measuring excess deaths in all countries and not any government Covid specific reports with all that entails. Maybe also post it on this thread...

Don't know what you're talking about :wink:

To be fair, Main board or sub board, JCFG always seems to find a way to embarrass himself :lolol:

That'll be it. Those 83 who voted poor or very poor voted first, that's always what happens :lolol: We'll give it a bit longer :thumbsup: (And I'm sure you meant 91 and not 83) Oops 92 *edit * 93

I didn't choose the options in the original poll, and if we are going to compare them, the options need to stay the same. I've already been moaned at for there being 3 positive options and only 2 negative, but it's all Uncle Spielberg's fault as he did the original one. Here US, catch :wink:

I'll try and do this very simply. Everyone knew it would be different. Nobody knew what it would be. Better ? :smile:

I'm guessing that 107 votes in 4 days against 253 votes in 2 months still doesn't mean anything if the answer doesn't reflect well on your impeccable Conservative and Unionist (for now) Party :lolol:

Of course I (and anyone else with a brain cell) knew the results would be different after two months actual experience of the Government dealing with the situation. Re-doing the poll would have been completely pointless if not :facepalm:

I still remember when Michael Heseltine said “Well, I think that you have to see Boris as a career map. He works it out, he decides which way the wind is blowing, and that wonderful phrase about a politician - a man who waits to see the way the crowd is running and then dashes in front and...

WTF have Corbyn or Starmer got to do with this :shrug: The question, that you have completely ignored is How do you think the Government have handled it so far ? Your first line was a reasonable repsonse, then you went off at a complete tangent.

Early days with only about 17% of the number of votes on the last poll, but significantly different to 2 months ago

As was pointed out on the original thread https://www.northstandchat.com/showthread.php?379010-How-do-you-think-Boris-has-handled-it-so-far/page145 a lot has changed in the last couple of months and the same poll may not give the same answers. As in the original, I'm making the assumption that...