Search results

According to? Close to 60% of this country is forest where no one lives, very few work. We live in cities. If you are going to do some "scientific conclusions" based on population density and make a comparsion, you also have to include the British Antarctic Territory in the comparison if you...

Not very similar either. No one knows if the lockdown strategy or other factors are the cause of the higher number of deaths per capita. Neither do anyone know what "unavoidable deaths" are. One could argue that everyone who dies from this was a "avoidable" death or one could argue that none...

It is largely assumptive as with most things regarding this disease. We'll see in a year or two what strategy turned out the best (or "least worst"). The numbers "on the surface" says that our strategy is significantly better than the ones in Belgium, Spain, Italy, France, UK, the Netherlands...

Its four entirely different countries with different cultures, different health care systems, different elderly care systems, different. Its impossible to know if its a "direct consequence" when there are many, many factors involved. Its like saying that UK numbers of 219.22 deaths per million...

About older people, yeah if you want to be really scared you can put a lot of emphasis on the deaths of 90 year old, multi-sick individuals in nursing homes. Would these have a better chance of another year or two of laying in their own shit and not knowing their own name if we had a lockdown...

Too bad "basically" takes you nowhere as its far more complicated and the big differences in how the elderly care i structured seem to make a significant difference. In Norway you have well-paid (meaning they stay within the job longer and gain a lot of experience), well-educated doing most of...

No it doesnt mean "the disease must be asymptomatic in 31,850,000" because several millions could have had mild or moderate symptoms without getting tested.