Search results

will it? i use public transport myself. there are millions who that isn't practical, or have negative impact on the their life.

this is where the campaign starts to lose people. to the vast majority driving isnt anti-social, its a vital part of living, not an optional extra. whether it is or not is besides the point, it will just rile people against the causes.

London traffic growth has been controlled, reduced a little, its still incredibly busy on the roads. a congestion tax means the council have incentive not to stop cars going into the centre, as they'll lose revenue. so there will be a small reduction, while the ideas of pedestrianised...

raise revenue or cut traffic, which do you want? this is the foolish path, it seeks to do two conflicting objectives at once and will achieve neither properly.

the days of the taxi are numbered, to be replaced by auto-driving electric "uber" vehicles. there will be no one to lobby.

only because some other goons are telling us we must give up meat to save the planet.

is that an argument in favour or against?

the poster child Ghent allows deliveries up to 11am, so residents would have pay for am delivery and shops arrange likewise or evening. we already go to out of town retail parks for a TV or sofas anyway.

i used to flirt with these or trams, came to conclusion there is no advantage over electric buses, which are more flexible too.

its a fine idea as long as provision is made for trades and delivery. not sure how buses would fit, though they should be moved to electric solving the pollution aspect.