im still unsure what his point was as he didnt clarify it. He certainly said anything the tories "do" couldnt be ruled unlawful, which is expanding quite a lot further on from Law (suspension of parliament for example)
You seem to have missed what he said, that the Tories have passed a law (singular and specific) which prohibits anything they do (now or in the future) from being ruled unlawful.
When you consider laws can be challenged through the courts.( for example the Uk Court of Appeal and European courts...
Before you sod off can you let me know which Law that the Tories have passed prohibits any thing they do from being ruled unlawful. (according to you).