Surely it would have been funnier to put her in a red and white striped shirt with a dart in her hand and photoshopped her between Jim Bowen, a tankard and a fat couple from Barnsley?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Let's also be clear that you've ignored (or conceded) the other points in my message to rewrite history.
Michael Foot - 0 General Election wins.
Jeremy Corbyn - 0 General Election wins
Tony Blair - 3 General Election wins. 3 THREE. Three.
F.A.C.T.
A lot of things are inane but succesful. The X Factor. Barbie Girl. Dan Brown novels. The Sun.
That Labour utterly failed to debunk it is part of Corbyn's terrible campaign. That JRG is blaming Blair for that is, well hilarious. That Labour are thinking that the way to get back into power is to...
So Corbyn lost to a bloke with an inane slogan who couldn't debate his way out of a fridge? You do realise that's not a good thing?
:lolol:
You are a card. So when Blair won it was because he was up against a weak government but when Corbyn lost to a weak government it was all Blair's fault...
In which case can you explain how a minority government that had been through two different leaders, barely won a single vote, failed to deliver Brexit, failed to do anything, led by a lying racist and full of sexual harrasment allegations and Islamaphobia not only won but turned a massive...
It’s not a dream. I said either on this thread or the Brexit thread that the last thing I want is for people to suffer and therefore, perversely, I hope he makes a success of it.
I just don’t think that a man who Ken Clarke said “couldn’t run a whelk stalk” and who needed a permanent “pooper...
I see it as a worthwhile gamble electing Starmer.
If Boris makes a success of Brexit there isn’t a politician alive who’ll stop him getting elected next time so the Labour leader will be a moot point.
If, as expected, he turns the country in to an enormous stinking pile of cowshit, and life...
As far as everyone else in the country, bar a minute subset of activists, is concerned that’s already the situation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You’ve completely missed the point. I didn’t mention anything about the size of home ownership. The point is that one policy allows interest rates to control other elements of the economy under the control of someone who knows what they’re doing with the pleasing side effect that people who have...
**** me you are funny, but not in a good way. Are you suggesting the BoE’s ability to regulate an economic downturn using interest rates is a BAD thing? Or that the answer to a housing crisis is higher levels of repossession and homelessness?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL. A loyal Labour voter who seems to have forgotten all the achievements from the first Blair government, including handing interest rate control to the Bank of England - a policy that persists today and made the last 11 years or so just about liveable for working class homeowners.
As for...
I didn’t say it was anathema. I’m saying that on this very debate you have two Corbynistas who cannot agree whether it is conference or Momentum who make LP policy.
I agree regarding the Tories but haven’t they always been supported by foreigners and big business? It’s not news.
Sent from my...
See, that sort of conspiracy theory seems like it has legs, until you consider that a lot of actual real Tories decided that the very man to lead them was someone who has gone on record as contradicting himself on Brexit, has been openly racist in print, professionally avoids debate and...
Except, according to London Irish it is Momentum’s job to make policy. You can see why people are confused about their role and have the impression that Labour isn’t aligned.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here’s some data for you. Boris Johnson’s Tories have a majority of 78. Labour barely scraped 200 seats. Tory winning margin in Sedgefield, Tony Blair’s former seat 4513, a vote share gain of 8.4%. Corbyn’s general election wins 0. Corbyn’s minutes as Prime Minister 0.
More data - Kyle kept his...