Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. M

    [Politics] Pretty Vicious PMQ NHS Exchange

    It's not an open cheque if it's got a number on it is it. I'm not sure what you mean by 'fix it' - upping spend to £180bn is what's required to maintain current standards - but to be clear the level of funding I'm talking about would be what I guess would be required in order to deliver...
  2. M

    [Politics] Pretty Vicious PMQ NHS Exchange

    Blimey that 55-65 pot looks like it could be a free for all. Wouldn't they traditionally be more weighted towards BoJo?
  3. M

    [Politics] Pretty Vicious PMQ NHS Exchange

    Why? I reckon it's important and that it needs it. Where? Across the board. :thumbsup:
  4. M

    [Politics] Pretty Vicious PMQ NHS Exchange

    I think you're right to focus on efficiency. Of course the NHS should be expected to display improved efficiencies. Hence the 5-year-forward plan to save c.20bn. I think it's an extremely pertinent figure. Cheaper US drugs doesn't necessarily square with the plan to shift towards a greater...
  5. M

    [Politics] Pretty Vicious PMQ NHS Exchange

    'Underfunding' in this context has a very specific meaning; the shortfall between current funding plans and the funding required to sustain current levels of service over the next 10-20 years (I can't remember the exact number). It is absolutely not impossible to bridge this gap. I reckon your...
  6. M

    [Politics] Pretty Vicious PMQ NHS Exchange

    Health spending has dropped as % of GDP and hasn't kept up with the minimum required +4%pa, nor is it expected to any time soon. Sent from my STF-L09 using Tapatalk
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here