Search results

:lolol: yes we will have to differ on this occasion. All the best.

But did it though? I thought it was brought in so that important but contentious decisions could be correct, and corrected if the ref got it wrong. ???

:lolol: :thumbsup:

Tell you what, when we get our next controversial VAR call agin us, I'm happy to accept it, if it is correct, and you can bounce this and BURN me if I don't.

Salute, Deadly :lolol::drink:

Another post that makes no sense. We got a penalty that would have been missed without VAR. Please don't make me have to raise the drink driving, speed limit and seatbelt laws again.....and how the rules and limits have been adjusted over the years in order that they slowly become more and...

Yes, I didn't see it either. Aaron didn't appeal it - he just rolled about in agony. We were all wrong. The VAR team and refs have been criticised for not correcting referee errors when missing pens. On this occasion, probably after prompting from the VAR directorate in Referee HQ, they got it...

Roundly mocked by Chris Sutton. Aaron cited on R5's 606 end of show cheating player mocking section, but Sutton refused to accept the 'nomination' and his name was withdrawn. Let's see the bedwetting on MOTD. It will be another chance for clueless pundits to stir the 'VAR controversy' pot, no...

So you accept it was a pen, but you don't like it? I struggle to understand your point :shrug:

Second post on thread and . . . end of thread. Hats off to Chris Sutton for calling it right and shutting up all the other muppets on 606.