Search results

In vogue to bash it...since Hillsborough?...since hacking a dead child’s phone? ...I’m trying to work out the in vogue benchmark you’re referring to? You are right though, printing a tasteless story about a cricketer’s family isn’t it exactly high on the absolute travesties this paper has been...

Rubbish, only 1 person mentioned it, you lumped the other posts in because it suited the point you wanted to make.

I don't really understand your point. Stokes earns a healthy sum from playing cricket, but he has no other choice but to enter into a central contract to play for England. Do all England players sign that contract with clause 2.4.1: if you sign this you'll have to accept all invasions of privacy...

How can you not stereotype the readership of The Sun, Mail and Express!? :shrug: It's a bit like saying you're stereotyping football fans by saying they all like football.

3m buy a hardcopy version of those particular papers each day. It doesn't mean it's the same 3m every day! :lolol:

But dangerous, with great influence, propaganda and political power. 3m read this toilet paper every day...