Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. perseus

    [Travel] Cycle lanes - good for the environment, congestion, health and the economy

    I think you are confusing lane (on the road mixed with motorised traffic) and paths (off road). Destination cyclists (not the lycra brigade) will use off road if available for safety reasons.
  2. perseus

    [Travel] Cycle lanes - good for the environment, congestion, health and the economy

    Much the way I would describe Brighton for cycling, but worse!
  3. perseus

    [Travel] Cycle lanes - good for the environment, congestion, health and the economy

    Tip: if you are in a hurry cycling through Shoreham, try and avoid the railway crossing gates: official cycle route is a mare. Alternative way is to go under bridges. The real problem in Shoreham is too many cyclists, not enough off road routes and very crowded at weekends. Clear sight lines...
  4. perseus

    [Travel] Cycle lanes - good for the environment, congestion, health and the economy

    ‘Genuinely fearing for my life’ - a Dutch man’s view of cycling in Dublin ‘The drivers of most vehicles showed little respect for cycling’ https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/genuinely-fearing-for-my-life-a-dutch-man-s-view-of-cycling-in-dublin-1.3946612
  5. perseus

    [Travel] Cycle lanes - good for the environment, congestion, health and the economy

    Worthing to Shoreham along the coast path is excellent. Hove to Brighton is awful though: crowds at a tangent to cyclists. Go inland through Shoreham, although the coast road is only really dangerous by the parked cars near the lighthouse. High tide may mean the lock gates are open for boats...
  6. perseus

    [Travel] Cycle lanes - good for the environment, congestion, health and the economy

    The idea of induced demand – more cycle space brings more cyclists, not enough cycle paths, bloody pedestrians
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here