There isn't any, neither is there any evidence that they boost tourism. It simply isn't there.
You see, I'm not advocating a Republic - because that's a much much wider and complicated deal. Will never happen, who will untangle that ?
What completely bemuses me is that instead of defending the...
I thought they'd be done by the local builder (or simply went for the highest quote) but rest assured loyal subjects, 2.4 million looks an absolute bargain.
As well as the general refit they've added:
- Two New Orangeries (Homebase were doing 2 for 1 over Easter apparently)
- A Vegetable...
No, they JUST DON'T WANT TO PAY TO RENOVATE A PRIVATE RESIDENCE FOR A MILLIONAIRE WHO COULD SIMPLY GET A MORTGAGE.
( or simply cut into their HUGE inheritance )
Evidence clearly shows that if you get the Royals out of the Palace tourism increases :)
Not suggesting they go (far more things wrong with out constitution) but it needs to modernise.
Harry get a mortgage mate.
Sent from my BLA-L09 using Tapatalk
When did the deal include building a minor Royal a private home ?
It's scandalous. The Royals are more than privately wealthy to fund this.
2.4m benefit payment, nothing more nothing less.
Sent from my BLA-L09 using Tapatalk
The Crown Estate is not the personal property of the Queen.
https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/en-gb/resources/faqs/
The Crown Estate belongs to the reigning monarch 'in right of The Crown', that is, it is owned by the monarch for the duration of their reign, by virtue of their accession to the...