Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Uh_huh_him

    [Palace] Costs of the Royal family

    I don't think we should get rid of them. I think they do a good job. There is a fair and reasonable arrangement in place, in the main. However spending an additional £2.4m on a private residence for Harry, is morally no different to the Expenses scandal at Westminster. Why not choose to live...
  2. Uh_huh_him

    [Palace] Costs of the Royal family

    Yes but the Crown Estates do not belong to the royal family.... The Crown Estates are a Trust fund which secures revenue for the queen and the treasury. Effectively Joint ownership, but neither party own them. The revenue from them is supposed to pay for government (previously the...
  3. Uh_huh_him

    [Palace] Costs of the Royal family

    It's not actually their land though is it.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Estate
  4. Uh_huh_him

    [Palace] Costs of the Royal family

    In regards to the actually property in question, Frogmore Cottage. I believe this is part of the Queen's property portfolio, which she has given to her grandson as a residence for his family. I don't think the property is open to the public. it looks like Frogmore house itself is only open...
  5. Uh_huh_him

    [Palace] Costs of the Royal family

    We don't have to get rid of them. But surely we can look to cut back on how much we spend on them. They are independently wealthy. They could survive without the handouts.
  6. Uh_huh_him

    [Palace] Costs of the Royal family

    Would they be less of a draw to tourism if we didn't pay for them?
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here