Search results

I'd agree on Labour and think that Boris would go to Brussels, return and make a Churchillian speech to whip the Tory masses about some new concession, which wouldn't be a great deal, in the hope of getting May v.4 over the line and use that as a clear exit strategy.

Correct, but if we had PR and, potentially, either more independent MP's or conviction MPs in the main parties then they are more likely to vote for what they stand for and for the constituents to vote for the candidates that best suit their political wishes

I see what you're saying but by the GE each party "should" be able to clearly define what their exit, or not, strategy is and by what means. If they can't they won't get any votes and they know that would be political suicide.

I think the electorate understand sufficient now to make a simple choice, in or out, based on what's on the table at that time. The problem is, and this is why we need PR, every Labour or Tory MP will need to tow the party line and we need MP's who better represent their constituents and not...

Surely if there's a GE they'll be no need for a referendum, each party will set out it's stall on what they propose and then the country votes, it's a solution that won't suit people but will be necessary given the need for a GE.

Boris wins Pushes for take May deal (plus a couple of tiny concessions having been back to Brussels for the EU to laugh at us) No deal Crash out 31 Oct