That's a matter for the mods. I assume they have their reasons for not banning the account.
My perspective is that, unless he is banned, the more people who know that he, imo, poses a potentially existential threat to NSC, the better. You obviously take a different view - fair enough.
A community he constantly shat over for years on end; a community he took active steps to get disbanded. Is it any wonder that some members of that community aren't exactly welcoming him back when he could:
A) apologise
B) Use his original account, OR
C) If he insists on using a previous...
That too.
And an incident involving a cyclist.
Neither of these are what gets me going though. It's that when he decided to leave NSC, which co-incidentally was right about the time he decided he was running for public office and was concerned about what his potential constituents might see...
Close - but nothing to do with "legal action". If that's used as a reason, a mysterious ex-poster gets in touch with Bozza, and threads get locked. Not "legal action" - a referral to the ICO.
See this post, which has, oh, 103 likes...