I'm happy with the, so far unfulfilled, result of 2016. People did speak. Not how you wanted it granted, but they did.
The word you use 'confirmed' is quite revealing. Sounds very much like a best of 3/5/7/9/11 ad infinitum proposal rather than simply accepting the result with decency.
The reason it has been dragged out to three years is a combination of Eurocrats not wanting us to go, remainers not wanting us to go and hence putting as many clogs in the wheels (nice Euro origin of saboteur) hoping this would happen or we'd all just forget about it and succumb to our...
So, if we have a vote on something in the future, but the following week someone finds out some more info in Wiki, we need to do the whole malarkey again, ignoring Pt. 1 totally? I'm with you.
I would sooner, for the sake of our democracy, the result was carried out from 2016. Then have another vote to see if people have changed their mind, then we could apply to re-join if necessary. Adhere to one result at time, or a backlog builds up.
Otherwise, and I am probably very wrong, it...
Why should we, when the result of 2016 has been ignored totally? OK, I've got it, if Remain won a new one, then ignore the result of that one too. I'm in.