Search results

Before the 2016 Referendum was announced, there was not a march of hundreds of thousands of people in London asking for one. There was also not a petition of several millions asking for one. That is a fact.

There is public demand for one now, more than there was for one in 2016.

If I thought you were capable of understanding, I would explain it to you.

One of the things we will owe them money for is our share of Farages Pension, as well as everyone else that has been employed to work on our behalf in the EU. The rest is spending commitments the EU made and we agreed upon as a member, this is reckoned to be about £85 Billion, but we have a...

There is more than just the cost of living. There must be some party that represents your views on something that is important to you?

I don't think older people should not vote in an EU referendum, but I don't think we should be counting the votes of large numbers of people that are now dead, which to say that the leave result from 2016 is still valid in 2019 does.

It makes sense not to report a result in one area before the voting is completed in all areas, it could affect the choices others make. It's a democratic norm.

Brexit is the gate way to all the other policies.

How about Sussex then, which had a two hundred year history as a Kingdom, before being annexed by the Kingdom of Wessex?

That is far from the only thing.

They were just rounding out the picture for you of Nigel Farage, but he is not the only person they will be sending to the EU, here is some info on the others that could get the chance to not bother doing anything. It's still up to you if you want to vote for them, but do so with your eyes open...