Many thanks for the clarification on insults and the repercussions.
NSC has been most enjoyable over the last 2 decades, so the idea of another message board is anathema.
In view of this, I'll be happy to support the mods by reporting insults and language that could be considered offensive.
As is invariably the case with most of your posts, I concur. I was probably too accommodating with the aspect of insults, however comparatively minor.
If infractions being given out can help with the smooth running of the board whilst ensuring consistency, clarity and transparency, then I'm...
Firstly, many thanks for explaining the reason on the moderating section:
"This user has ended up banned under the totting up process. He was given the lowest possible infraction for starting a thread about being banned from another thread but this was enough for a short holiday.
He was banned...
Politely, I have to disagree.
There was speculation on this thread that the OP was prevented from posting as he called someone else a 'prick'.
And yet on another thread (the 'Shit Day' one), there were a number of insults flying around from long-established posters.
No action was taken on it...
NSC would be much improved in terms of transparency if the specific Moderator who makes a decision to stop a contributor from posting on a thread is named.
This way, any accusations of certain bias against certain posters, political viewpoints, etc. can be considered objectively as well as any...