Search results

That is the point. Glad you've got it. He turned down an offer from Rotherham because he didn't like it. Without a contract this summer, he will be unemployed. That means his income will be zero (apart from Universal Credit, if he qualifies). At this point an offer of a lower salary becomes...

If, after reading it again, carefully, you would like to tell me exactly which part of the basic sentences you don't understand, I will try explaining it to you. :shrug:

I merely presumed that Bozza would be the person to make a thread a sticky, if there was any appetite for keeping it going. However, it appears that there isn't sufficient interest/enthusiasm for such a thread. So be it. I thought it was a good idea, but hey ho, not so. :shrug:

This: ".....and presumably also the option not to extend his contract? At which point the Rotherham offer is likely to look a whole lot more interesting. His agent won't be happy ..........................." Quite straightforward.

I did try for a while. Especially on Saturday afternoons I'd be watching SSN and recording whenever xxx scored for yyy or whatever, but ultimately it was just me bouncing my own thread. I'd still like to see it as a regular recurring thread, like the word association or the albums you've been...

.....and presumably also the option not to extend his contract? At which point the Rotherham offer is likely to look a whole lot more interesting. His agent won't be happy ...........................

Many thanks to CJ and AZG for all this wealth of wonderful information. I did try a while back to start a thread on which the exploits of our loanees could be recorded and readily available to all - you know, info like, Towell scored twice for Rotherham last night, Dreyer getting rave reports on...

So, about as restrictive and effective as FFP then?