Search results

I think we'll leave it there.

Oh dear. Nevermind. I'm sure you'll get over it.

Agreed!

Yes City had great chances. But whilst you assume City 'should have won 3 or 4 goals to 1' why do you not count the Liverpool chances as goals also? Makes no sense.

Bit blinkered that but I would expect that as you have exhibited your prejudice before. Liverpool were a cm from taking the lead and could consider themselves unlucky not to have scored a couple more times. Luck and great defending by City. I agree that City were the better team though.